UPDATE, 13 February: For an overview on today’s vote, see this new post: The Democrats who voted against the stimulus bill in the House, part II: Once more round the bend.
Yesterday, as Americans will know, the House of Representatives passed the $825 billion stimulus package that was proposed by the Democratic leadership. It passed by 244 votes to 188, without a single Republican vote in favour. 11 Democrats voted against.
Who were those Democrats? The Clerk’s Office of the House has the roll call:
|46||28-Jan||H R 1||On Passage||Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year ending 2009|
The Democrats who voted nay were:
- Allen Boyd – FL 02
- Bobby Bright – AL 02
- Jim Cooper – TN 05
- Brad Ellsworth – IN 08
- Parker Griffith – AL 05
- Paul Kanjorski – PA 11
- Frank Kratovil – MD 01
- Walt Minnick – ID 01
- Collin Peterson – MN 07
- Heath Shuler – NC 11
- Gene Taylor – MS 04
WSJ’s Washington Wire notes that “Bright, Parker, Kratovil and Minnick are freshman lawmakers, while Boyd, Cooper, Ellsworth, Peterson, Shuler and Taylor [and Minnick - nimh] are members of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition.”
Mind you, the Blue Dog Democratic Coalition has 47 members in all, so almost 6 out of 7 Blue Dogs actually voted in favour.
As the quickly improvised map above shows, most of the Democratic Nay votes come from rural and small-town districts, and six of the 11 Democratic Representatives who voted against were from the South. That’s still a small minority of Southern Dems in the House though.
The dilution of the stimulus bill during its preparation for the House vote has driven some liberal observers up the wall, and hyperbole aside not without reason. So many concessions, and still not a single Republican vote? Why bother in the first place?
But on the side of the defense, Josh Marshall argues that it might all turn out to be smart strategy; with Marc Ambinder chiming in that what may seem like Democratic gullibility is also done with an eye of unrelated upcoming votes. The Congressional Progressive Caucus, in its turn, has made a point (in a memo that’s not on their own website – what’s up with that?) of highlighting all the priorities it did manage to get into the bill. For example, a “20% temporary increase in maximum food stamp level above the FY2009 level for two years” (cost: $24 billion), “Medicaid payments to states (FMAP)” (cost: at least $15 billion) and “Unemployment benefits (UI) extension” (cost: at least $12.7 billion).
Now to wait how many of their proposals make it through by the time the Senate’s done with the bill as well.