Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 472

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 487

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 494

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 530

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/observat/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 623
God I hate politics sometimes ... | Observationalism

God I hate politics sometimes …

Politics, US Politics

Kevin Drum explains an arcane-seeming bit of “parliamentary minutiae” driving business in Congress, which can be used to bury a bill at the last moment. The trick is to use a rule, which allows the minority party one last motion before the final vote on a bill, to send it back to committee - where “given the fact that it’s already probably been in committee for months, and the calendar is packed full of other stuff, [..] the bill dies”.

So here’s what happens with these recommittals. The minority party proposes an amendment that will make great campaign fodder. On the reauthorization of the AmeriCorps volunteer program last March, for example, Randy Kuhl proposed language requiring criminal background checks on prospective volunteers. If he were genuinely concerned with background checks, he would have accepted “forthwith” language and allowed a vote on his amendment, which probably would have passed. But he didn’t. He insisted on “promptly” language instead. Why? Because he knew that the majority would resist delaying the bill by sending it back to committee, and that’s what he was really after. He wanted to force them to vote down his motion so that Republicans could all go home and claim that Democrats had voted against background checks on AmeriCorps volunteers.

As they say, read the whole thing … and expect a lot of this kind of obstruction from the Republican opposition in the next couple of years.

Related posts:

  1. “Politics Ain’t Beanbag:” Illinois Edition [caption id="" align="alignleft" width="171" caption="Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D-Elvis)"][/caption] It is...
  2. The Republican Senators who voted for the stimulus bill, Round II: The final bill If you were in any suspense about which Republicans voted...
  3. The Democrats who voted against the stimulus bill in the House, part II: Once more round the bend So the vote is in; the US Representatives in the...
  4. Politics Detox [caption id="" align="alignleft" width="226" caption="I took this photo of...
  5. Polling the stimulus You may have seen Karl Rove opine in the WSJ that "support for...

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>